Love, notice, in addition to suppression of viewpoint regarding personal solutions

Love, notice, in addition to suppression of viewpoint regarding personal solutions

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you can Human Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area from accessory from inside the human mating. Review of Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Internet sites paradox revisited. Record from Societal Products, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A social technical you to decreases public involvement and you may emotional really-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, timing, and time of marriages and divorces. Current Inhabitants Profile, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional studies off closeness, appeal, and you may connection: Research the presumptions of the triangular concept off love. Psychological Profile, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Feeling finest regarding performing tough: Societal contrasting within close matchmaking. Journal out of Personality and you can Social Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K dato site., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: Brand new implicit cognition out-of close competition. Journal regarding Identification and you can Societal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.

A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you can dating repairs elements

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to glamorous alternatives: New advanced therapy out of relationships maintenance. Advancement and you may Peoples Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential studies regarding dispute and you will agreement for the disappointed and you will nondistressed marital partners. Diary from Contacting and Scientific Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. An effective., Eco-friendly, A good. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationships creation on the internet: What’s the big interest? Record away from Societal Products, 58(1), 9–30.

Some great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization in addition to structure from pleasure during the close relationship

Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-comparison intentions inside personal relationships: A model of all over the world improvement and you can certain confirmation. From inside the P. Noller & J. An excellent. Feeney (Eds.), Knowledge ents from the examination of couple communications (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College Push.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-counselor bond through the contact out-of attachment concept. Psychotherapy: Concept, Research, Behavior, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The public monitoring program: Improved sensitiveness so you’re able to social signs since a transformative reaction to public exception. From inside the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh new societal outcast: Ostracism, social exemption, getting rejected, and bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Mindset Press.

Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). All over the world and you will certain relational models in the connection with public relationships. Log away from Identification and you can Societal Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you may suggestions seeking to when you look at the close dating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may particular accessory representations in the adulthood: Is there a relationship?. Journal Regarding Personal And personal Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. When you look at the J. Harvey & A great. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate romantic dating: Fix and you may enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection myself perception certainly one of spouses while the a purpose of this new similarity in their mutual experience. Personality And you will Social Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Negative effects of salience out of extrinsic benefits to your preference and you can enjoying. Journal of Character and you may Social Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.